![]() Would a third-party program be able to capture at the requested Apple ProRes 422HQ? I read that FinalCut Pro can capture this format. What should I select?Īlso what Capture File Format is best for quality? The options are: Of which only the first two work - the rest all display a black capture window. What settings should I use in the Preferences? They have requested the following codecĪpple ProRes 422 HQ (pref'd) or Apple ProRes 422, 1080, or HD size - just make it bigger than 720. ![]() All it needs is a pair of analog stereo inputs (which any receiver will have) and ProLogic II.Hi - I'm using the BlackMagic Intensity Shuttle to rip VHS cassettes for DVD production and my responsibility is to hand off the highest quality capture of the VHS tapes to a boutique production company who are going to adjust sound and video quality. The receiver doesn’t have HDMI and cannot handle lossless Dolby TrueHD or DTS-HD Master Audio signals, but it doesn’t need to. I have to set it up using only the front panel display. It’s so basic that it doesn’t even have an on-screen menu system. This is a no-frills, entry-level (or close to it) Dolby Digital/DTS model from 2003. With a little patience while monitoring For Sale ads on my local Craigslist, I managed to pick up a pair of used Marantz SR4400s for well below $100 each. ![]() (If using multiple secondary receivers, I recommend that they be identical to each other.) Any receiver that has, at a minimum, Dolby ProLogic II processing will do. Although your primary A/V receiver must be a Dolby Atmos (or DTS:X) model capable of decoding 7.1.4 channels of sound from a Blu-ray or UHD immersive audio soundtrack, the secondary receivers don’t need to be nearly as fancy. With his permission, I’m just trying to explain it here.įor as perhaps ridiculously complicated as they may be to install, one of the saving graces of these experiments is that they can be assembled relatively inexpensively. Credit for that goes to Scott Simonian and others at AVSForum who helped him work it out. The silly Zatmos and Scatmos nicknames can be more formally grouped under the heading of “Dolby Atmos Extended.” I want to be clear here that I did not develop the Scatmos process. Eventually, I knew that if I was going to do this, I needed to do it right. However, in recent months, my attitude changed and I grew less satisfied with the Zatmos configuration. I felt that the results I had with Zatmos were good enough to get me most of the way there, and I had a certain amount of egotistical pride that I’d figured out a way to do it with just one extra receiver rather than two. The complexity of installing, connecting and configuring three A/V receivers seemed like overkill to me. Over at AVSForum, a member named Scott Simonian had gone even further to use a total of three A/V receivers in unison to create a 7.1.6 configuration (affectionately known as “Scatmos”) more accurate to the intentions of the original Dolby Atmos sound mixers.įor a while, I decided not to go that far. See Also The Best VPN Server Countries to Connect Through "Unfair and irresponsible" claim? Pinoy vlogger sa South Korea, inimbestigahan ang "Hermes snub" kay Sharon Cuneta Hocus Pocus 2 Ver Películas Online Gratis Castellano 20 mejores campañas en redes socialesĮven at the time, I was not the only person experimenting with this, and I knew that my Zatmos system was not as ideal as I would have liked it. ![]() I needed to find a way to jury-rig a similar effect for a fraction of the cost. Unfortunately, the asking price for that Trinnov processor is absurdly beyond my budget. The better solution is to install additional speakers in the center between the other height channels (Top Middle position). Those speakers are now fixed in place with wiring through the walls and ceiling, and I can’t move them without remodeling the room. This issue is compounded by the fact that the locations where I had installed speakers when I built the home theater (before immersive audio was a concern I gave any thought to) were less than ideal for Atmos. That, combined with a low ceiling, makes it difficult for just four speakers (two in the front of the room and two in the back) to image a sound above my head convincingly. My own home theater is a long room with a lot of space behind my seats. Nonetheless, for some of us, a limit of four height channels isn’t enough to fill the top of the room with sound.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |